Legal Opinion

Krinsky v. Leventhal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff by this bill in equity seeks to recover on a written guaranty of a promissory note made by Edwards Trailer & Body Co., Inc., payable to the plaintiff. Two issues were submitted to a jury, namely (1) Is the defendant, Harold A. Leventhal, indebted to the plaintiff on the instrument alleged to be a guaranty, referred to in paragraph 6 of the bill of complaint and alleged to have been given on or about August 22, 1946 ? and (2) If the defendant is indebted on such guaranty, what is the amount of the indebtedness? On the first issue the answer of the jury was “Yes.” ' On the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Atwood v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Donovan v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Smith v. Vose & Sons Piano Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Continental Supply Co. v. Tuckerrose Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Leventhal v. KrinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. New England Merchants National Bank v. HossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  5. Goodwin v. Shopperstown Livery Service, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API