Legal Opinion
Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1990No. 89 Civ. 0746 (PKL)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged conspiracy to violate federal securities laws by failing to disclose legally-required, material information relating to a proposed proxy contest for control of a corporation. 1 Plaintiffs allege that defendants have violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Plaintiffs also seek recovery under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. Defendants have now moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- B v. Optische Industrie De Oude Delft v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.