Legal Opinion
In Re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1998No. 96 Civ. 4584(MP)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DECISION
POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
Global Minerals and Metals Corp. (“Global”) and R. David Campbell (“Campbell”), (collectively referred to as the “Global Defendants”) move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the Second Claim of the Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”), brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. (the “Second Claim”).
Background
Plaintiffs allege that Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo”), through its head copper trader Yasuo Hamanaka…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Sumitomo Copper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Schmidt v. Fleet BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.