Legal Opinion
Town of Monroe v. Renz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 29, 1997No. AC 15219PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*7 Opinion
LANGENBACH, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court permanently enjoining them from using a rock crusher and from blasting rock to supply the rock crusher in their sand and gravel operation at 201 Turkey Roost Road in the town of Monroe. On appeal, the defendants assert that the trial court improperly (1) determined that they were collaterally estopped from relitigating their defense that the blasting and rock crushing, although otherwise in violation of Monroe’s zoning regulations, was a permissible expansion of a nonconforming use, (2) determined that their rock…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. New Milford Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Greenfield v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- City of Stamford v. StephensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Town of Canterbury v. DeojayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.