Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Blust

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1909No. 15,514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 83 Neb. 678.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This case is submitted on rehearing. Our former opinion is reported in 83 Neb. 678. The cause was submitted to the district court upon the pleadings, the affidavits of witnesses, and copies of public records. A bill of exceptions containing the original evidence adduced is before us. It is a difficult undertaking to sift the conflicting statements, and, without the aid of cross-examination, establish the controverted facts. Were it not for the public importance of the questions of law involved, we would affirm the Judgment because of the condition of the record. The land in controversy is' in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Smith v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Brosnan v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Maffet v. QuineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1899
  5. United States v. Rickey Land & Cattle Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sturgeon v. BrooksWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gila Water Co. v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Peck v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. United States v. Utah Tower & Light Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API