Legal Opinion

Maffet v. Quine

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided March 15, 1899No. 2,540PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELLINGER, District Judge.

During the years 1887 and 1888 the Latourell Falls Wagon Hoad & Lumber Company, a corporation, located and constructed a flume for a distance of some four miles, connecting their lumber mill with the town of Latourell., This *348flume was constructed of lumber, and crossed’ tbe land owned by tbe defendant, Quine. Tbe plaintiff has succeeded to the property and rights of the Latourell Company. There is a question as to whether this land, at the time the flume was constructed, was pub: lie land of the United States, or whether it belonged to the Northern Pacific Railroad…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Dalles Lumbering Co. v. UrquhartOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Kakeldy v. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Le Quime v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Turner v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API