United States v. Rickey Land & Cattle Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
The questions to be decided at this time are presented by the demurrer of the defendants to the bill of complaint, and by the application of the complainant for an injunc*497tion pendente lite and the affidavits and documentary evidence used upon the hearing of that application. The bill, alleges, in substance, that the United States is the owner of certain described lands, which are a part of a natural basin, including what is known as “Alkali Rake”; that said lands have been withdrawn from, entry and reserved by the Secretary of the Interior for reservoir purposes, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- United States Freehold Land & Emigration Co. v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Nippel v. ForkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Verde Water & Power Co. v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Rasmussen v. BlustNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- United States ex rel. Sierra Land & Water Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Pine River Irrigation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Silver Lake Power & Irrigation Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.