Legal Opinion

United States v. John B. Stetson Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 12, 1933No. 3567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellee made two entries of imported leather at the port of Philadelphia under the Tariff Act of 1930. This leather was classified by the collector for duty as grained sheepskin leather under paragraph 1530 (d) of said act. The importer filed protest, covering both entries, making various claims therein; however, at the hearing before the United States Customs Court, all said claims were abandoned except the claim that the goods were properly dutiable under paragraph 1530 (c) of said act as “finished” leather. The protest was sustained by the trial court under said paragraph 1530 (c),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  2. GRK Canada, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. DMV USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API