Johnson v. Guedoir
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 14.) Defendants Sami and Nadia Guedoir, and Carthage Trading, Inc., (“Defendants”) oppose Plaintiffs motion on the grounds that Plaintiffs damage claim for multiple visits to Defendants’ property raise genuine issues of material fact. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has filed a reply to Defendant’s opposition. (ECF No. 17.) The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Avalos v. SandhuDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- David Robinson v. Nadeem Akhtar Anjum and Shazia AnjumDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- James Rutherford v. JJS Market and LiquorDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Johnson v. Reimal Family Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Johnson v. Winterstar, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.