Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Reimal Family Limited Partnership
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 8, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01192Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-01192-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS ADA CLAIM AS MOOT AND GRANTING PARTIAL MOTION FOR 10 REIMAL FAMILY LIMITED SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING PARTNERSHIP, et al., UNRUH ACT STATUTORY DAMAGES 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 28 12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Defendants Reimal Family Limited Partnership, Reimal Family Limited Partnership, and 15 M. William Reimal (“defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff Scott Johnson’s ADA claim under 16 Rule 12(b)(1) as moot because they have fixed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.