Legal Opinion
James Rutherford v. JJS Market and Liquor
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 24, 2020No. 5:18-cv-02656Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 JAMES RUTHERFORD, Case No. 5:18-cv-02656-ODW (SHKx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT 14 JJ’S MARKET AND LIQUOR; et al., JUDGMENT [45] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff James Rutherford (“Rutherford”) moves for an entry of default judgment 20 against Talat Radwan and Natasha Radwan, owners of the property in question, and JJ’s 21 Market and Liquor, a retail establishment (collectively, “Defendants”). (Mot. for 22 Default J. (“Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 45-2.) For the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.