Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Cassidy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 4, 1975No. 47077PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Can an oil and gas lease be cancelled for lessees’ failure to pay accrued royalty when that failure is in violation of the express terms of the lease but such remedy is not expressly provided by the lease ?

The trial court answered in the negative, granting judgment to lessees. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, cancel-ling the leases and quieting title thereto against lessees. We Grant Certiorari, Reverse the Court of Appeals, and Reinstate the District Court’s judgment in favor of lessees.

The oil and gas leases in question provided for quarterly payments to lessors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Coal Oil and Gas Company v. StyronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Ionic Petroleum, Limited v. Third Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Robertson v. ManeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Danne v. Texaco Exploration & Production Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. McLaurin v. Shell Western E. & P., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. McLAURIN v. SHELL WESTERNCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API