Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The question on appeal is whether traumatic neurosis is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and if so, whether the healing period for such mental injury is- to be determined solely on a physiological basis.

Dr. Houkom, the Industrial Commission, and the circuit court took the view that the limitation in the use of the appellant’s arm after November 1, 1954, was a residual. The Industrial Commission could only find such permanent partial disability on the basis that traumatic neurosis existed and caused such limitation of use. Either the appellant has a true case of traumatic…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ladner v. Higgins, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Swiss Colony, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Casa Bonita Restaurant v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Valadzic v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API