Legal Opinion

United States v. Aceto Chemical Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 21, 1977No. C.A.D. 1186; No. 76-10PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the Customs Court, 75 Cust. Ct. 167, C.D. 4625, 408 F. Supp. 1389 (1975), granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and holding that a fungicide containing less than one percent benzenoid product, as a wetting agent, is properly classified by the principal ingredient, thiuram, under item 425.36, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). We affirm.

The merchandise, described on the invoices as “Thiram 76% W.P. green,” was classified under item 409.00, TSUS, as a mixture in part of a benzenoid product provided for in Subpart C of Part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. United States v. Cavalier Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Genender Wholesale v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  4. Bantam Travelware, Division of Peter's Bag Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. Pharmacia Laboratories Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API