State v. Euler
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,761 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MEGAN DANIELLE EULER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Venue can be proven with circumstantial evidence. 2. When the plain language of a criminal statute unambiguously applies to a given set of facts, the Legislature necessarily intended that statute to apply. 3. When two or more criminal statutes can apply to a given set of facts, the identical offense doctrine is the proper analytical tool to determine which crime the defendant can be convicted of and sentenced under. Review of the judgment of the Court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. Spencer Gifts, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
- State v. HueySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026