Legal Opinion
Hafen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 17, 1994No. 92-59LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs pro se complaint alleges that his property interest has been taken without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Defendant counters that plaintiff has not asserted a valid property interest for which compensation should be made.
Facts
Plaintiff, Darrell G. Hafen, maintains that he was the owner of 5,120 acres of placer mining claims within the boundaries of Death Valley National Monument. Death Valley, is under the supervision of the Director…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nickerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Ware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Ogden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Holden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.