Lately v. Silacal, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MICHAEL LATELY, et al., CASE NO. 3:22 CV 1134 Plaintiffs, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II SILACAL, INC., et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants. ORDER INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 51). The matter is fully briefed and decisional. (Docs. 54, 55). Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion in part and denies it in part. Specifically, the Motion is granted as to Plaintiffs’ claim of…