Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Recupero

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1988Published

1DissentTitone, J.

Unlike the rule derived from the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, New York’s rule concerning joint representation of codefendants is operative not only when there has been a demonstrable actual. conflict of interest, but also where a significant possibility of such conflict existed (People v Monroe, 54 NY2d 35, 38, n 2, cert denied 455 US 947). By holding that a "significant possibility” is "more than a potential conflict” and that a jointly represented defendant can obtain a reversal only if the conflict "operated” as well as "exist[ed]” (majority mem, at 879), the majority…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API