Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Smith-Powers Logging Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Coos: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is an action of ejectment by Andreas Anderson and Alfred Brunell against the Smith-Powers Logging Company, a corpofation; Coos County of the State of Oregon, a municipal corporation; John F. Hall, County Judge; E. A. Anderson and W. T. Dement, County Commissioners, sitting as the County Court of Coos County, Oregon. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

From Coos: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is an action of ejectment by Andreas Anderson and Alfred Brunell against the Smith-Powers Logging Company, a corpofation; Coos County of the State of Oregon, a municipal corporation; John F. Hall, County Judge; E. A. Anderson and W. T. Dement, County Commissioners, sitting as the County Court of Coos County, Oregon. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

The defendant the Smith-Powers Logging Company is a Minnesota corporation engaged in the logging business in Coos County. The defendants John H. Hall, E. A. Anderson, and W. T. Dement are, respectively, the county judge and the commissioners of the County Court of Coos County. Coos County is also made a party defendant.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiffs are tenants in common, the owners in fee simple, and entitled to the possession of the following described parcels of real property, situated in Coos County, State of Oregon, to wit:

Lot 4 together with all tide lands…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Marriott v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Board of Health v. Van HoesenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Fanning v. GillilandOregon Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Kendall v. MohlerOregon Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API