Legal Opinion
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 23, 2001No. Consol. 97-10-01801PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
I. Standard of Review
The Court will uphold Commerce’s rede-termination pursuant to the Court’s remand unless it is “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(l)(B)(i) (1994). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sandra J. Walton v. Mental Health Association of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Branco Peres Citrus, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- New World Pasta Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.