Legal Opinion

Roberts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1996No. 94-2511PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This court must determine whether the trial court properly made the following findings: (1) that USF&G did not act in bad faith in breaching the duty to defend Wikel; (2) that USF&G was entitled to a setoff; and (3) that Wikel was entitled to only $1.5 million in damages for USF&G’s breach of its duty to defend. For the following reasons, we'uphold the trial court’s determination that USF&G did not act in bad faith and, thus, we reverse that portion of the court of appeals’ judgment remanding this issue to the trial court for reconsideration. We reverse the court of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. SaidOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Revilo Tyluka, L.L.C. v. Simon Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Wagner v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. DiCenzo v. A-Best Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Westfield Companies v. O.K.L. Can LineOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kaufman v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API