Wagner v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
This appeal and cross-appeal presents a number of issues for our consideration. First, we must decide whether the judgment of the *289court of appeals to remand the issue of the Wagners’ bad faith claims was proper. Second, we must determine whether the appellate court’s decision to reverse the directed verdict in favor of Ruth Wagner on the breach of contract claim was appropriate, based on the application of the “innocent spouse” rule. Next, we must decide whether the court of appeals erred when it found that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Shemo v. Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Martin v. Ohio State University FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mastellone v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- DiCenzo v. A-Best Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Sager v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.