Ex Parte Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Plflli CURIAM.
Herein is presented an application of E. Byrd Davis for á writ of habeas corpus to secure bis release from tlie custody of the sheriff of Oklahoma county. The facts are, briefly, as follows: Archer & Bryden, a mercantile corporation of Oklahoma City, brought a suit in replevin against the petitioner and his wife, wherein it seeks to recover possession of a lady's fur coat. On March 23, 1.927, W. J. Waite, a justice of the peace for the Oklahoma City district, issued a writ of replevin, summons in re-plevin, and. an attachment for the petitioner. All three of these orders were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. NewblockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- L. Puster & Co. v. Anderson, Evans & WardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- In Re CurtisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dannenburg v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Ex Parte FlippoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937