Legal Opinion
State v. Cuypers
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1997No. C2-96-1116PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
As Justice Cardozo might state, the issue in this ease is whether the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act falls within the constitutional power of the legislature. We find that it does.
FACTS
In December 1994, a state patrol trooper stopped a pickup truck driven by appellant Eugene Francis Cuypers because its license plate and registration tab were obscured. After the trooper determined that appellant’s driver’s license had been revoked and that appellant could not produce proof of insurance, the trooper cited him for driving after revocation and no proof…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Allstate Insurance v. KelleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Jack Potter v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- State v. HershbergerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- City of Wichita v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.