Legal Opinion
State v. Stallman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 1994No. C6-93-2156Published
1Opinion of the Court
519 N.W.2d 903 (1994)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Jason Edward STALLMAN, Appellant.
No. C6-93-2156.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 26, 1994.
Carl J. Newquist, Newquist & Ekstrum, Chtd., Fridley, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Robert A. Hoard, Michael J. Scott, Jensen, Hicken, Gedde & Scott, P.A., Anoka City Prosecutor, Anoka, for respondent.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and NORTON and KLAPHAKE, JJ.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Jason Edward Stallman was convicted after a court trial of violating Anoka's "cruising" ordinance, Anoka, Minn.,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.