Legal Opinion
Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 30, 1933No. 32516PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
This is an action for damages for an alleged unlawful arrest and malicious prosecution of the plaintiff. He alleged in his petition that the defendant, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, was organized under the laws of New Jersey, and doing business in Louisiana. The citation and a copy of the petition were served upon the secretary of state and also upon the general superintendent employed by the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, at its .principal business establishment in Louisiana. It appears, however, that the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, upon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Tremont Lumber Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Pugh v. FlannerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Tarver v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Lehman Dry Goods Co. v. LemoineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Moore v. Gencorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Thibaut v. ThibautLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Seale v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Searcy v. NovoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.