Legal Opinion
Searcy v. Novo
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1939No. 5879PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
This suit is a sequence to a settlement between plaintiff and defendant, his attorney, of the amount of the judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor in his suit against the Interurban Transportation. Company, Incorporated, et al., reported in the 189, La. 183, 179 So. 75. Defendant represented plaintiff, with the assistance of other counsel, throughout the controversy culminating in the referred to decision. The other counsel entered the case after the suit had been filed and served. The suit was lost in the lower court, was appealed to this court and here lost. See 171 So.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Gwin v. FountainMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Thweatt v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Parkerson v. BorstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLPSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Delta Equipment and Constr. Co. v. Royal Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Cattle Farms, Inc. v. AbercrombieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.