Legal Opinion

Fetherolf v. Torosian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 In this medical malpractice action, Mark and Barbara Fetherolf appeal from the judgment entered upon a directed verdict in favor of Appellees Michael H. Toro-sian, M.D., Susan B. Orel, M.D. and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. 1 Appellants argue that the trial court erred in directing the verdict because Appellants introduced sufficient evidence that Appellees deviated from the accepted standard of care and that Appellants suffered compensable damages. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand this matter for retrial.

¶ 2 The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Eaddy v. HamatySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lear, Inc. v. EddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Zieber v. BogertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Mount Olivet Tabernacle Church v. Edwin L. Wiegand DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Maverick Steel Co. v. Dick Corporation/Barton MalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Fleishman v. General American Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API