Legal Opinion

Jerome v. Rust

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Hon. Joseph' W. Jones, Judge. On rehearing. Rehearing granted.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This cause is one before the court upon a rehearing; the former opinion of this court being found in 21 S. D. *410191, 110 N. W. 780. The complaint herein alleges the following-facts: The plaintiff Jerome obtained a judgment against one H. W. Rust in the county court of Minnehaha' county. After such judgment was obtained, Jerome assigned the same to the plaintiffs Muller and Conway as security for an indebtedness. After such assignment the said defendant Rust appealed said cause to this court, and upon such appeal gave the usual bond upon appeal, conditioned both for the payment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Bendernagle v. CocksNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Nagel v. LutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Jerome v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sodak Distributing Company v. WayneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Carr v. PreslarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API