Legal Opinion

Jerome v. Rust

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Franklin Jerome and others against H. W. Rust and others. From an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the demurrer to the complaint. It is alleged in substance in the complaint that in March, 1904, the plaintiff Jerome recovered a judgment in the county court of Minnehaha county for $129.60; subsequently an appeal was taken by the defendant to the Supreme Court. Pending this appeal Jerome 'assigned his county court judgment to the plaintiffs .Muller & Conway. As security on the *192appeal from the county court to the Supreme Court the defendant gave what is known as a “cost bond,” and also- a supersedeas bond, containing the usual provisions; the two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tate v. Ohio & Mississippi RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Murray v. HayNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  3. Nichols v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Bort v. YawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Goodnight v. GoarIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jerome v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API