Legal Opinion

Ruhl v. Lee's Summit Honda

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 31, 2010No. SC 90601PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Lee’s Summit Honda appeals a judgment denying its motion to compel Ashlee Ruhl to arbitrate her individual claims against it. Ruhl filed a class action suit against Honda, seeking damages for its unauthorized practice of law, section 484.020,1 and its deceptive practices connected with the sale of merchandise under the Missouri merchandising practices act (MPA), sections 407.010 to 407.130. Honda claims that the trial court erred in failing to compel arbitration because the claims were within scope of the parties’ arbitration agreement, the unauthorized practice of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kansas City Urology, P.A. v. United Healthcare ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Woods v. QC Financial Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Soars v. Easter Seals MidwestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. Bertocci v. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Manfredi v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Ashley Dill v. Jason Hale and Autocenters Bonne Terre, LLC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API