Legal Opinion

People v. Calabria

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2004PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of burglary in the second degree. The key issue at trial was the identification of defendant as the perpetrator. There was one eyewitness, the victim, who positively identified defendant both at a lineup and in court. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction based upon the eyewitness identification.

“The standard for reviewing the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether ‘after viewing the evidence in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. DelamotaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. HamptonNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. People v. LindseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. ThibodeauNew York Court of Appeals · 2018

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API