Legal Opinion

Trustees of Columbia University v. Nathan Kalvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In two other actions between the same parties on leases similar to the one which is the basis of the complaint herein (Trustees of Columbia University v. Kalvin, 250 N. Y. 469), it was held- “ At the expiration of the lease the tenant remained in possession. He had a right to do so until the completion of the appraisal and the choice by the landlord under its option to grant a new lease or pay for the building on the premises. For the use of the premises during such period ho is liable to the landlord for an amount equivalent to the rental reserved *776in the lease, and not for the amount fixed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Trustees of Columbia University v. KalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Trustees of Columbia University v. KalvinNew York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. SelengutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API