Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Selengut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the trial of this action for a judgment declaring the rights of stockholders and directors of this New Jersey corporation, it was disclosed that a proceeding was pending in the New Jersey courts in which the issues involved in this case would necessarily have to be decided. Under the circumstances, the discretionary remedy of declaratory judgment should be withheld and the judgment appealed from unanimously modified so as to provide for the dismissal of the defendants’ counterclaim and, as so modified, affirmed. (City of New York v. Maltbie, 248 App. Div. 39; Trustees of Columbia…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of New York v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Trustees of Columbia University v. Nathan KalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API