Legal Opinion
Siegling v. International Ass'n of Approved Basketball Officials, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 29, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 66-73PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SIMONS, District Judge.
Defendants, International Association of Approved Basketball Officials, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the Association), Roger J. Sheridan, and Donald Lomme, have appeared specially to move to quash attempted service of process upon them and to dismiss, set aside and quash the service of the summons and complaint upon each of these defendants upon the ground that the service of the process upon them was insufficient, and that the court therefore lacks jurisdiction over them. An additional ground that the venue is improper was abandoned by these defendants.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Ross v. American Income Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nehemiah v. Athletics Congress of U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Roorda v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AGDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- McNeely v. Clayton and Lambert Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Nehemiah v. Athletics Congress OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Gardner v. Q. H. S., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1969