Legal Opinion

Ross v. American Income Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 1958No. 17401PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

By agreement of counsel, these two actions were consolidated on appeal. One is to recover damages for fraudulent breach of an insurance contract and the other to recover damages for fraud and deceit in inducing plaintiff to enter into a contract of insurance. Defendants appeared especially for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction of the Court and moved in each case to vacate and set aside the service of the summons. The trial Judge held that the Court acquired jurisdiction of the defendants in personam and refused to set aside the service. The defendants have appealed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. National Life Co. v. StegallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Zacharakis v. Bunker Hill Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Cain v. United Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Brown v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Triplett Ex Rel. Triplett v. R. M. Wade & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API