Legal Opinion

Nehemiah v. Athletics Congress of U.S.A.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 17, 1985No. 84-5680PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff Renaldo Nehemiah, a renowned hurdler who holds the world’s record for the 110 meter hurdles, lost his eligibility to compete in amateur track and field competition when he signed a contract to play professional football. Rule 53 of the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) provides that an athlete will not be eligible to compete in either domestic or international competition if s/he “has competed in any sport ... for any pecuniary reward.” Rule 53 is incorporated and made applicable to the members…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Reliance Steel Products Company v. Watson, Ess, Marshall & EnggasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1991
  3. Hollins v. United States Tennis Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  4. Mbm Fisheries v. Bollinger MacHine Shop and ShipyardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Citibank v. Estate of SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API