Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Q. H. S., Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 13, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 68-1088PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
This is a products liability case presently before the court upon the question of jurisdiction. Defendant, a non-resident of South Carolina, contends that it is not amenable to substituted service of process and thus not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of South Carolina and of this court.1 It moved to dis*1248miss the action, or in lieu thereof, to quash the return of service of summons.
The jurisdictional facts are simple. The defendant Q. H. S., Inc., is a New York corporation which produces, in New York, a certain type plastic hair curler. Defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gloria R. Hardy v. Pioneer Parachute Company, Inc., and Parachutes IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Creative Communication Consultants, Inc. v. Byers Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Reilly v. P. J. Wolff & SohneDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974