Swedish Hospital Corp. v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRYANT, Senior District Judge.
This memorandum addresses plaintiffs’ petition for attorneys’ fees in a group of cases, brought by Medicare provider hospitals, challenging the 1979 Malpractice Rule changing the method for calculating reimbursement of malpractice insurance premiums. 2 Plaintiffs prevailed on the merits. Petitioners now seek attorneys’ fees and expenses under the “bad faith” fees provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b) (1988), which provides the same relief against the government as would be available against any other party…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Concept Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Owens v. National Medical Care, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Taylor Group, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. PriceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Select Specialty Hospital - Denver, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020