Legal Opinion

Swedish Hospital Corp. v. Shalala

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 5, 1993No. C.A. 87-3534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRYANT, Senior District Judge.

This memorandum addresses plaintiffs’ petition for attorneys’ fees in a group of cases, brought by Medicare provider hospitals, challenging the 1979 Malpractice Rule changing the method for calculating reimbursement of malpractice insurance premiums. 2 Plaintiffs prevailed on the merits. Petitioners now seek attorneys’ fees and expenses under the “bad faith” fees provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b) (1988), which provides the same relief against the government as would be available against any other party…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Concept Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Owens v. National Medical Care, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. Taylor Group, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. PriceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  5. Select Specialty Hospital - Denver, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API