Concept Automation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Concept Automation, Zenith Data Corporation, and Falcon Microsystems filed actions to recover bid and proposal costs and attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting administrative appeals and a U.S. district court challenge to the decision of the U.S. Postal Service to award a computer contract to a competitor, Digital Equipment Corporation. In many respects, the legal issues are similar to those in Crux Computer v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 223 (1991) and Finley v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 704 (1994), appeal dismissed, 50 F.3d 21 (Fed.Cir.1995), but…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- MVM, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.