Legal Opinion
Wilhite v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 2011No. WD 72058PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
Nathan Wilhite appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Wilhite claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his guilty pleas were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered in that his plea agreement with the State was breached when he was not placed in the Department of Corrections Sex Offender Assessment Unit. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
On November 14, 2007, Nathan Wilhite entered guilty pleas to three counts of the class B felony of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Proctor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Day v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Reed v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Harper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. BryanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by4 opinions
- STATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. OrrSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Chacon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Smith v. NEW LIBERTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF CLAY COUNTYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- CURTIS SHORE v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014