Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. VALENTINE v. Orr

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 2012No. SC 92434PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether Zane Valentine’s (hereinafter, “Valentine”) placement in the Sex Offender Assessment Unit (hereinafter, “the SOAU”) constitutes participation in a 120-day program for purposes of section 559.115.3, RSMo Supp.2010. 1 This Court holds the SOAU is a 120-day program that provides a treatment component during the assessment process for offenders. Therefore, the Honorable Mark Orr (hereinafter, “the circuit court”) abused his discretion by entering an order denying Valentine’s release on probation when the order was entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. State v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Young v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Akins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  5. STATE EX. REL. CITY OF JENNINGS v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Bateman v. RinehartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. Bailey v. Hawthorn BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Milton Young v. Boone Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Jereme Roesing v. Director of Revenue, State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API