Legal Opinion

McLennan v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1991No. 129-87TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This tax case is before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks a refund of $325,-438.69 for federal income taxes paid in the 1980 and 1981 taxable years for the contribution of a scenic easement to the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (Conservancy). Defendant maintains that plaintiff’s transfer of the scenic easement was not a charitable contribution under § 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of the 1954 (Code),1 26 U.S.C. § 170. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied and plaintiff’s motion is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hernandez v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foundation of Human Understanding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Americold Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Speck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. McLennan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Elinor P. McLennan Individually and as of the Estate of Donald R. McLennan Jr., Deceased, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API