Legal Opinion

Americold Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 28, 1993No. 374-89TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

WEINSTEIN, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer to assert an offset. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.

*749 Facts

Plaintiff, Americold Corporation (formerly “Termicold Corporation”), is a taxpayer engaged in the business of owning and operating low-temperature facilities specially designed for foodstuffs. In the taxable years 1973 through 1976, plaintiff placed in service refrigerated structures (or additions thereto) (“earlier structures”) at several locations in Iowa, Idaho, Utah, and Oregon.

Plaintiff claimed investment tax credits…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. County of OneidaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
  3. Principal Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API