Legal Opinion

McLennan v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 10, 1991No. 129-87TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This tax case is before the court after a trial on the merits. Plaintiff seeks a refund of $325,438.59 in federal income taxes paid in the 1980 and 1981 taxable years, for the contribution of a scenic easement to the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (Conservancy). Defendant maintains that plaintiff’s transfer of the scenic easement was not a charitable contribution under § 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of the 1954 (Code),1 26 U.S.C. § 170, and alternatively, that plaintiff was entitled to a $70,000.00 deduction for the charitable donation.

Factual Background

The facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Chiu v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Lawrence B. Sheppard and Charlotte N. Sheppard v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. George A. And Meryl Collman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elinor P. McLennan Individually and as of the Estate of Donald R. McLennan Jr., Deceased, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Cave Buttes, L.L.C. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  3. New Jersey v. Bessent; Village of Scarsdale v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  4. New Jersey v. Bessent; Village of Scarsdale v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  5. Wendell Falls Development, LLC, Gregory Alan Ferguson, Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API