Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rothering v. Mc Caughtry

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-2485-WPublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Per curiam

Aaron S. Rothering petitions pro se for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 522, 484 N.W.2d 540, 545 (1992). Rothering contends that appellate counsel was constitutionally deficient in failing to seek withdrawal of his guilty plea. Upon consideration of the petition and response, we conclude that Rothering's petition challenges the conduct of postconviction counsel and his remedy, if any, is with the trial court. We deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Rothering entered a guilty plea to seven counts of criminal conduct. An appeal pursuant to Rule…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. MonjeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BallietteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Emmanuel Page v. Matthew J. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Eric D. Johnson v. Gary R. McCaughtry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API