Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Initial Investments, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-7162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — ORDER

ANITA BRODY, District Judge.

I am asked to decide: (1) whether venue is proper in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) where at the time the cause of action arose all defendants were citizens of Texas and no substantial part of the claim arose in Pennsylvania; and (2) whether venue here is nevertheless proper under 18 U.S.C. § 1965, the special venue provision for cases brought under the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) statute. I find that venue here is not proper under § 1391(b), that defendants’ connection with this district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Southmark Prime Plus, L.P. v. FalzoneDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  4. Leech v. First Commodity Corp. of BostonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Shuman v. Computer Associates International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. AntokolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Kunkler v. Palko Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API