Legal Opinion
Kunkler v. Palko Management Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 12, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-4910PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants, Palko Management Corporation (“Palko”) and Richard A. Palko’s (“Richard Palko”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff, John Kunkler’s, Complaint based on, among other things, improper venue. For the following reasons, this Court finds that venue is improper in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. However, we will not dismiss the case; rather, we will transfer this action to the proper venue in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges three Counts. Count I is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Jaguar Cars, Inc. v. Royal Oaks Motor Car Company, Inc. Theodore J. Forhecz, Sr. Mark M. Forhecz Theodore J. Forhecz, Jr. Richard Kirsh Jack Rusher Edward Zeller, Mark M. Forhecz, Jaguar Cars, Inc. v. Royal Oaks Motor Car Company, Inc. Theodore J. Forhecz, Sr. Mark M. Forhecz Theodore J. Forhecz, Jr. Richard Kirsh Jack Rusher Edward Zeller, Theodore J. Forhecz, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shuman v. Computer Associates International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Eastman v. Initial Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Al-Ghena International Corp. v. RadwanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Zazzali v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012