Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Craycraft
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Jackson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Gavin, J. —
The appellee sued to recover damages for injuries to five mules, sustained by reason of their being put into a defective car.
*204The first paragraph counts on the common law liability under an ordinary parol contract of shipment.
The second paragraph sets up a written contract.
The court, in its special finding, found in favor of the appellant upon the second paragraph and for the appellee upon the first.
The appellant questions here the sufficiency of the first paragraph, claiming that it does not sufficiently allege performance of the contract by appellee.
An examination of the complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harrison v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Meyer v. BohlfingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Cleveland & Toledo R. R. v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stewart v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Pennington Grocery Co. v. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. SeeleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909