Legal Opinion
Pennington Grocery Co. v. Wood & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1923No. 12293PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL. O.
This .is an appeal by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, from a judgment of the district court of Carter county, in favor of the de fendant in error, defendant below.
The action calls for damages in the sum of $515.03 and interest at six per cent, from January 1, 1918, for breach of implied warranty of fitness and soundness of a earload of potatoes.
The plaintiff had an agreement over long distance phone with a commission merchant in Oklahoma City to purchase of (he defend. s.<>t a carload of potatoes at $2.50 per ewt. After the agreement over the phono the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Larson v. Aultman & Taylor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Tacoma Coal Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albert Brauer v. Republic Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Pauls Valley Grain & Seed Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Wood Co. v. Pennington Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929